FEATURING
Michael Miller, University of California, Santa Barbara
TITLE
Barack Obama, John Dean & Other Criterion Shifters
ABSTRACT
We make many decisions throughout a day that require setting a criterion (i.e., deciding how strong the evidence must be), from the mundane (“Have I read that article before?”) to the more critical (“Can I cross the street in time?”). Setting a criterion also has important theoretical implications, such as understanding the nature of some false memories. Many decision models can accurately predict how the placement of a criterion to fit a given situation can affect performance, especially when the evidence is uncertain. Yet, no existing model explains how an individual sets a decision criterion, and why people are generally suboptimal in shifting a criterion in order to achieve the most beneficial outcome. We have discovered that while some people are actually quite good at adapting their criterion, others are not at all. Our research seeks to explain this phenomenon using a combination of behavioral and neuroscientific methods.
BIO
VIDEO
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iat2mM9C1RM[/youtube]
Annually the Department of Psychology hosts a Colloquia Series throughout the academic year.